Cookie Consent by Free Privacy Policy Generator website
My Comparison Table:

Choose a car

image of Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback

Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 40 Tech Specs

from: 2021

other variants:

Compare all variants of the Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback side by side

Prices

Price in the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland (GBP)
On The Road Price
£51,125

Show prices of all variants

Battery Capacity Gross/Useable 82​/​76.6 kWh

Range (WLTP) 534 km 331.8 mi

Minimal Consumption (WLTP) 16.8 kWh/100 km 27 kWh/100 mi

Acceleration 0-100 km/h 8.5 s

Acceleration 0-60 mph 8.2 s

Performance Specs

  • Power: compare 150 kW (201 hp)
  • Torque: compare 310 Nm 229 lb-ft
  • Number of Engines: 1
  • Drive: compare Rear
  • Acceleration 0-60 mph: compare 8.2 s
  • Acceleration 0-100 km/h: compare 8.5 s
  • Acceleration 0-62 mph: 8.5 s
  • Acceleration 0-160 km/h: compare 20.8 s
  • Acceleration 0-100 mph: 20.8 s
  • Top Speed: compare 160 km/h 99 mph
  • Quarter Mile (402.3 m): compare 15.3 s

Official Range and Energy Consumption (Combined)

  • WLTP Range (TEL*): compare 534 km 331.8 mi
  • WLTP Range (TEH*): 460 km 285.8 mi
  • WLTP Consumption (TEL*): compare 16.8 kWh/100 km 27 kWh/100 mi
  • WLTP Consumption (TEH*): 19.6 kWh/100 km 31.5 kWh/100 mi
  • Min Consumption NEDC: 16.1 kWh/100 km 25.9 kWh/100 mi
  • Max Consumption NEDC: 17.4 kWh/100 km 28 kWh/100 mi
  • Petrol/Gasoline equivalent: 1.89 l/100 km 124.7 MPGe

* TEL (Test Energy Low) indicates the lowest values (most economical) with the lightest set of options
TEH (Test Energy High) indicates the highest values (least economical) with the heaviest set of options

Battery

  • Battery Type: Lithium-ion
  • Battery Capacity Gross: compare 82 kWh
  • Battery Capacity Useable: compare 76.6 kWh

Dimensions and Weights

  • Body Type: SUV
  • Length: compare 4588 mm 180.63 in
  • Width: compare 1865 mm 73.43 in
  • Height: compare 1614 mm 63.54 in
  • Wheelbase: 2764 mm 108.82 in
  • Weight: compare 2120 kg 4674 lbs
  • Max Payload: 505 kg 1113 lbs
  • Weight Distr. Front/Rear: 47/53 %
  • Luggage Capacity: compare 535 l 18.9 ft3
  • Luggage Capacity Max: 1460 l 51.6 ft3
  • Frunk Capacity: comparedoesn't have a frunk
  • Max Roof Load: 75 kg 165 lbs
  • Max Trailer Load Braked: 1000 kg 2205 lbs
  • Max Trailer Load Unbraked: 750 kg 1653 lbs
  • Ground Clearance: compare 180 mm 7.09 in
  • Min Turning Circle (curb-curb): compare 10.2 m 33.5 ft
  • Tire Standard: 235/55 R19
  • Rear Tire Standard: 255/50 R19
  • Seats max.: 5

Charging

  • AC On-Board Charger Standard: 11 kW
  • DC Fast Charging: compare 135 kW
  • DC Charge Port: CCS
  • Charge Port Location: Left Rear

AC Charging Times (home, work, hotel)

Select State of Charge (SOC):

The maximum on-board charger power of the Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 40 is 11 kW.
All figures in the table above are assumed approximate values under optimal conditions.

DC Fast Charging Times

Select State of Charge (SOC):

The maximum fast charging power of the Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 40 is 135 kW.
All figures in the table above are assumed approximate values under optimal conditions.

Others

  • Platform: VW MEB
  • Dedicated EV Platform: Yes
  • Drag Coefficient Cd: compare 0.26

Safety - Crash Tests

Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback Pros and Cons

  • profile photo of user Dahshur Dahshur GB

    Audi Q4 E-tron Sportback Edition 1 Review and Comparisons to the Skoda Enyag 80 Suite 9.3

    owner review of Audi Q4 e-tron Sportback 40 2021

    • Good vehicle distance warning software which gives you how many seconds the vehicle in front of you actually is.

    • Air conditioning controls in the back for rear passengers to use. Not in the Enyaq.

    • 12v sockets throughout the car. Better than the Enyaq which only had one such socket - right in the boot!

    • Excellent handling and drive. Noticeably better than the Skoda Enyaq.

    • Despite the Sport suspension of the S Line trim, the ride is impeccable. Even speed bumps are well resolved and again better than the Enyaq.

    • Ambient Lighting Plus Package.

    • Sonos Sound System - no premium sound system on my Enyaq.

    • Swerve Assist and Turn Assist

    • Evasive Assist and Sideguard Assist

    • 125kW rapid charging. My Enyaq was capped at 50kW.

    • Laminated side glass which makes the car even quieter than the already quiet Enyaq.

    • Infotainment and software generally is better than that of the Enyaq.

    • Boot on the Sportback is actually bigger than that on the conventional SUV e-tron.

    • Privacy glass - again not available on my Enyaq 80 trim.

    • Electrically adjustable front seats.

    • Automatic Boot opening via the key. Not available on my trim of the Enyaq.

    • Heated front seats - not available on the Enyaq Suite.

    • S Line Trim which enhances the aesthetics of the car inside and out. Black Styling Package and stainless steel pedals.

    • USB C inputs x 2 in the rear for back seat passenger use. The Enyaq had these in the front only.

    • 3 zone Climate Control compared to the Enyaq's 2 zone Climate Control.

    • Has the Safety Pack Plus which includes blind spot warning and rear cross traffic alert. 

    • Matrix LED headlights with dynamic light sequencing.

    • Wireless Phone Charging - not available on my particular Enyaq.

    • Sport seating is firm but comfortable.

    • Unlike the Skoda, the Audi has no reversing camera. By far and away the most glaring of the Cons frankly, and I will have to buy a camera separately. No excuse, Audi - this is poor. Most lesser cars have reversing cameras as standard, including my former Enyaq Suite!

    • The Skoda has a heated steering wheel as standard - not on the Audi.

    • No forward sensors. Not quite as glaring a faux pas as no reversing camera but still unacceptable for a car at this level.

    • No rear wiper and small rear screen

    • The Skoda has a better Home Screen which combines the Map, Car Play etc along with other features. The Audi Home Screen is just a list of different functions.

    read the entire review

Compare the parameters of all the model variants

The technical information on this page are used from official data provided by the car companies and figures measured by our editorial staff and/or other independent persons. For further details, please visit the manufacturer's website.
If you think any of the information is wrong, please let us know.