Choose a car

My Comparison Table:
Nissan Leaf e+ 62 kWh Tech Specs
other variants:
Interior And Exterior Photos
Prices
Base Price (MSRP) | Destination Charge | Effective Price |
---|---|---|
$36,040 | $1,095 | $37,135 |
On The Road Price |
---|
£34,945 |
Preis inkl. MwSt. | Umweltbonus | Effective Price |
---|---|---|
41.100 € | -6.750 € | 34.350 € |
Battery Capacity Gross/Useable 62/56 kWh
Performance Specs
Official Range and Energy Consumption (Combined)
- WLTP Range (TEL*): compare 385 km 239.2 mi
- WLTP Consumption (TEL*): compare 18.5 kWh/100 km 29.8 kWh/100 mi
- Petrol/Gasoline equivalent: 2.08 l/100 km 113.2 MPGe
* TEL (Test Energy Low) indicates the lowest values (most economical) with the lightest set of options
TEH (Test Energy High) indicates the highest values (least economical) with the heaviest set of options
Battery
Dimensions and Weights
- Body Type: Hatchback
- Length: compare 4490 mm 176.77 in
- Width: compare 1788 mm 70.39 in
- Height: compare 1540 mm 60.63 in
- Wheelbase: 2700 mm 106.3 in
- Weight: compare 1685 kg 3715 lbs
- Max Payload: 380 kg 838 lbs
- Trunk / Boot Space: compare 385 l 13.6 ft3
- Trunk / Boot Space Max: 1176 l 41.5 ft3
- Frunk Space: comparedoesn't have a frunk
- Max Roof Load: 35 kg 77 lbs
- Ground Clearance: compare 142 mm 5.59 in
- Min Turning Circle (curb-curb): compare 10.85 m 35.6 ft
- Tire Standard: 215/50 R17
- Seats max.: 5
Charging
- AC On-Board Charger Standard: 6.6 kW
- DC Fast Charging: compare 100 kW
- DC Charge Port: CHAdeMO
- Charge Port Location: Front
AC Charging Times (home, work, hotel)
Select State of Charge (SOC):
The maximum on-board charger power of the Nissan Leaf e+ 62 kWh is 6.6 kW.
All figures in the table above are assumed approximate values under optimal conditions.
DC Fast Charging Times
Select State of Charge (SOC):
The maximum fast charging power of the Nissan Leaf e+ 62 kWh is 100 kW.
All figures in the table above are assumed approximate values under optimal conditions.
Others
- Platform: Leaf
- Dedicated EV Platform: Yes
- Drag Coefficient Cd: compare 0.29
Safety - Crash Tests
-
Euro NCAP see results 5 stars
-
NHTSA see results 0 stars
-
IIHS see results
No video
Nissan Leaf Pros and Cons
-
Martin GB
Nissan LEAF Tekna E+ Review: An often overlooked EV that’s hard to beat for value for money
Relatively affordable, even by combustion car standards
Comes well specced as standard
ProPilot makes busy motorway journeys effortless
Tried and tested reliability
The Nissan Connect EV app makes it easy to stay on top of the LEAF's current charge and location, and remotely control aspects such as pre-heating, flashing the lights, and even unlocking the car
Spacious interior space and boot
While the light steering does make for relaxing drives, the LEAF is easily influenced by the camber of the road resulting in what feels like misaligned steering
The lack of CCS makes the longevity of the LEAF's long road-trip capabilities a little cloudy
Interior is a little dated compared to the competition, taking a rather conservative approach
While the lack of active thermal management isn’t a major issue for (the lack of) hot days in the UK, a cold battery does negatively impact winter range and charging speeds
Low charging speeds compared to newer cars
-
this is my first electric car and I find driving it every day surprisingly fun even after a full year
it has a heat pump that reduces power consumption in cold weather
in the winter, Leaf is able to heat sufficiently after just 30 seconds
5 stars, the highest rating in the EuroNCAP crash test
after many years of production, “fine-tuned” and reliable drive
quiet operation
mobile phone application (consumption statistics, option of remote heating and air conditioning, battery status, option to start charging, etc.)
Nissan offers a free tow four times a year to a charger if you run out of power
battery warranty of eight years/160,000 km
very inexpensive regular service (service interval = 30,000 km or 1 year)
it has a timer to start charging once the el. rate is cheaper
low long-term consumption average of 14.93 kWh after 30,000 km
thanks to 80% regenerative braking, the brakes will hold out roughly 3 times longer than those in internal combustion cars
solid handling and comfortable suspension thanks in part to the large 270 cm wheelbase
decent dynamics in the city and beyond, despite power of “only” 80 kW (110 hp)/254 Nm
the charging connector is on the front bumper - ideal location
the car feels solid, nothing creaks when driving on uneven road surfaces
spacious glovebox
the BOSE sound system plays well
in infotainment, it is not possible to restrict charging e.g., at 80%
by today’s standards, it has a smaller battery capacity of 30 kWh/27 kWh usable
relatively wide A (windscreen) pillar
buttons on the steering wheel are not placed ergonomically, I cannot get used to them
the battery has no active temperature control (presents an issue over long trips with rapid charge)
higher weight - 1,570 kg
the steering wheel can be adjusted only in one direction (up or down)
inconveniently shaped trunk, where space is taken up also by the Bose subwoofer (though it is large enough)
somewhat odd-looking exterior design, like an ugly duckling
Compare the parameters of all the model variants
- Battery type
- Battery - gross
- Battery - usable
- AC charge power
- DC charge power
- Charge port location
- Max range WLTP
- Consumption WLTP
- Acceleration 0-100 km/h
- Acceleration 0-60 mph
- Quarter mile
- Top speed
- Power
- Torque
- Length
- Width
- Height
- Wheelbase
- Weight
- Trunk / Boot Space
- Frunk Space
- Turning circle
- Driven axles
- Platform
- Drag coefficient Cd
- Ground clearance
- Max Towing Capacity
The technical information on this page are used from official data provided by the car companies and figures measured by our editorial staff and/or other independent persons. For further details, please visit the manufacturer's website.
If you think any of the information is wrong, please let us know.